Skip navigation

ADJOURNMENT: Punt Road Planning Overlay

profile image
Sam Hibbins MP
Member for Prahran
12 February 2016

Mr HIBBINS (Prahran) — My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Planning. The action I seek is for the minister to remove the Punt Road acquisition overlay. There is currently a planning panel looking at removing, amending or retaining the overlay. Information submitted by VicRoads makes it clear that continuing with the overlay and pursuing a road widening would be an expensive, destructive and pointless exercise.

It will be expensive because the estimated cost for the road widening is half a billion dollars, money that should be used to invest in public transport options and managing the existing road network. It will be destructive because 130 properties would have to be taken to widen Punt Road, with many homes destroyed, including some buildings with heritage value and a local pub. It will have negative impact on local amenity, making residents' access to schools, parks, shops and services more difficult. It will be pointless because in VicRoads's own words, Punt Road volumes would increase significantly under the six-lane concept when compared to the base case, as additional demand is attracted to the corridor.

VicRoads's own projections show a 65 per cent increase in traffic along Punt Road with a road widening and only a marginal improvement in travel times of 4 kilometres an hour in the morning peak — that is $125 million per kilometre an hour. This is all based on VicRoads's projections, mind you, that suggest that after years of declining traffic on Punt Road we are suddenly going to have a massive growth in the number of cars on our roads. The projections need to be looked at very carefully.

I accept that acquisition overlays can be a tool to use to reserve private land for public use. In Stonnington we use them to reserve land for parks and open space as part of our planned and funded open space strategy, but to have an overlay on for 50 years for an unplanned and unfunded project that, if put in place, would be an expensive, destructive and counterproductive folly is not appropriate. The Punt Road area is not just a road that people drive through that needs to be widened at all costs; it is an area where people live, go to school, play in parks, walk along and visit family in hospital or in aged-care homes.

There is a good alternative. VicRoads currently owns around $19 million worth of assets along Punt Road. Some of these could be sold off to invest in Punt Road improvements — an improved route 246 bus service that links in with other services for an inter-city orbital route, modern bus stops with real-time electronic timetable displays and amenity improvements such as street trees and park benches, which are lacking in the area. Half a billion dollars could and should pay for increasing capacity on our train and tram network by upgrading our outdated rail signalling and providing new and upgraded stations, rolling stock and line extensions and an integrated transport network where tram lines and bus routes link up with train stations.

Much of the Punt Road area is in a residential growth zone. Removing the overlay would result in improved street frontages and the retention of heritage buildings and modern urban developments that cater to sustainable transport and add to the local amenity rather than vacant blocks and un-renovated homes. That would be a good future for Punt Road and the surrounding area.

RESPONSE FROM PLANNING MINISTER

Punt_Road_Planning_Overlay_Response.jpg

profile image
Sam Hibbins MP
Member for Prahran
12 February 2016
SHARE:

WHAT I'M FIGHTING FOR


LATEST NEWS

MEDIA RELEASE

Greens call on Upper House to block Labor’s tax on electric vehicles

The Greens have urged non-government MPs to oppose the Victorian Labor Government’s proposed tax on people who drive electric vehicles when the bill moves through Parliament in the coming months.   At a time when countries around the world are making EVs more affordable to drive down greenhouse gas emissions,...

PARLIAMENT

Members Statement: Urban Environment

Mr HIBBINS (Prahran): I rise to urge the state government to improve and consider our urban environment. I cite two examples where I recently met with residents where this needs to happen. Firstly, the Queens Way retaining walls, which were once porous green walls, have now been completely concreted over, with...

MEDIA RELEASE

Vicroads privatisation will put interested of private profit over public good

The Greens have slammed the Victorian Labor Government's decision to partly privatise VicRoads and have said it will put the interests of private profit over the public good. Victorian Greens spokesperson for transport, Sam Hibbins, said it was clear this government was addicted to privatisation and that it needed to...

PARLIAMENT

Question without Notice: Gas Imports

Mr HIBBINS (Prahran): My question is for the Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change. Minister, whilst last sitting week this house supported the ban on gas fracking in Victoria’s constitution, there are still currently plans for two gas import terminals in Victoria—in Western Port and Geelong. Can the minister...